Pennsylvania USGenWeb Archives

 

The City of DuBois

by

William C. Pentz

 

DuBois

Press of Gray Printing Co.

1932

 

 

Digitized and transcribed for the Clearfield County PA USGenWeb by

Ellis Michaels

 

Copyright

This page was last updated on 06 Jan 2014

Contribute Your Research

 

printer friendly version of this project

 

 

 

 

The City of DuBois

Chapter 29

Page 142

 

 

Page 142 THE POOR DISTRICT

during his servitude to the same extent that a parent is responsible for the keep of his child.

     When the child so bound came to the age at which he, or she, was emancipated from servitude, he was supposed to receive a gratuity from the master in clothing—in the case of a boy, a horse, in the case of a girl, a cow.

     If a child should happen to fall into a family where a child was actually wanted, the lot was not hard, but if, as frequently happened, the child was secured as a servant, the treatment of such a child was very much like a slave and would not be tolerated in this age.

     It is true that the County Commissioners still have a right to provide for indigent children under this apprentice system.

     Under the poor law system the fate of adults was less fortunate. Of course it was considered a disgrace for any one to permit any near relative to become a charge on the poor district, but sometimes it happened that the relative could not support the needy one, or there were no relatives. There being no County Home, nor poor house, the paupers were "farmed out." That is, under the early system, if a pauper had to be supported notice was given that on a certain day bids would be received for his support, or in other words, an auction held for the contracting for the support of these unfortunates. As a rule at an auction the highest bidder gets the property, but in this case the lowest bid for the support of the pauper secured the subject. If it were an old woman who could work she was expected to earn part of her keep. Likewise a man, and the contract was made for the care and maintenance of the pauper for a definite period. One can readily imagine the treatment received by these dependent people in the hands of strangers. They were rarely ever permitted so forget their position in the family, and while they were supposed to receive humane treatment it was usually the reverse.

     When the poor district of DuBois was organized, contemporaneously with the Borough, the population of the town was made up of persons coming from other sections, and not the pioneer element, therefore, a number of persons coming into the district required assistance from the poor district, and the office of Overseer of the Poor was one of considerable importance. The indigent were helped by what was known as "out door relief." That is, he was assisted to such extent as the Overseers of the Poor might deem necessary. If the pauper should happen to be a favorite he did not fare so badly. If he were inclined to be critical and complaining he got such treatment as the Overseers thought adequate under the circumstances. Unless the pauper had some person who would take up his cause he was helpless.

     Needless to say that the office of the Overseers of the Poor was not filled by the most intelligent citizenry of the electorate, and many stories are related of the malfeasance in office of this class of officer.
 

 

 

 

 

return to previous page

return to beginning

turn to next page

 

 

   

Return to Top of Page

 

Return To Clearfield County Main Index Page

 

Ellis Michaels, Clearfield County PAGenWeb Archives File Manager

 

Copyright 2013 - current, USGenWeb Archives