Bucks County PA Archives News.....ARMBRUSTER Murder in Nockamixon 1855
  ************************************************
  Copyright.  All rights reserved.
  http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm
  http://www.usgwarchives.net/pa/pafiles.htm
  ************************************************
  
  File contributed for use in USGenWeb Archives by:
  Michael Messinger mmessinger@macalester.edu

==========

  Committed to Prison August 7, 1855
  
  The Bucks County Intelligencer August 7, 1855

  On Saturday evening last, Phillip Kainich was committed to prison by Scott A. 
  Erwin, Esq., of Nockamixon township, charged with the murder of Christiana 
  Armbruster, wife of Jacob Armbruster, of that township.  On Friday great 
  excitement was created in the neighborhood by the report that a woman had been 
  murdered.  The facts appear to be these.  Some time during the day the body of 
  Christiana Armbruster was found just outside of her own dwelling, lying in a 
  pool of blood, with a terrible gash, cut by some sharp instrument, on the side 
  of her neck, just below the ear.  When the body was discovered, there was no 
  one about the house but a little child, a grand-child of the deceased, which 
  had been creeping about through the clotted blood and around the dead body, 
  presenting a most heart-sickening sight.  The fatal blow had been inflicted 
  inside the house by the door, and in her death struggles the woman had 
  evidently rolled out of the house.  A jury was summoned, and an inquest held 
  upon the body.  It was the opinion of the physicians present that the woman 
  could not have lived more than ten or fifteen minutes after the infliction of 
  the wound.  It was also shown before the jury that Philip Kainich, who resides 
  in that vicinity, was seen to come from the house a short time before the 
  discovery of the body, and a warrant was issued for his arrest on suspicion of 
  having committed the murder.  Search is also being made for Jacob Armbruster, 
  the husband of the deceased, who has not been seen since the murder.  He is 
  suspected of having had some hand in the terrible crime.  Armbruster has 
  heretofore been in the habit of abusing his family, and has been committed to 
  prison on several occasions for assaulting his wife.  We are informed that a 
  few days since he publicly swore he would kill his wife and then hang 
  himself.  Whether he has put this threat in execution is not known, but it is 
  hardly likely that he has destroyed himself.  He is well known in the county, 
  and also in Northampton, where he formerly resided, and he will no doubt be 
  arrested in a few days.
  Kainich says that he was at Armbruster's - that he went there to 
  collect some money of the murdered woman - that she told him to wait until her 
  son came home and then she would pay him; that she invited him to go and see 
  her garden, which he did, and afterwards left her.
  It appears that Armbruster and his wife have been living a quarrelsome 
  life for a long time past, and that he has repeatedly been in jail at Newark, 
  Easton, and Doylestown for assaulting her.  About two years since he struck 
  her with a hoe and broke her arm, for which offense he was convicted and 
  imprisoned.  He and his wife were both addicted to drinking at times, and were 
  frequently intoxicated.  She was an exceedingly athletic woman, and could play 
  a good game at fisticuffs herself.  She generally carried the purse, and also 
  held the title to the property on which they resided.  Armbruster often 
  expressed a desire to obtain possession of the property, and this was the bone 
  of many contentions between them.  Both parties are natives of Germany.
  
  
============

  Armbruster Arrested August 14, 1855

  The Bucks County Intelligencer August 14, 1855

  On Saturday evening , JACOB ARMBRUSTER, of Nockamixon township, was brought to 
  prison, charged with having murdered his wife, the particulars of which we 
  published last week.  Armbruster had been away some place since the murder 
  until Friday night, when he returned to his home.  Word having gotten out that 
  he had returned, Scott A. Irwin, Esq., John Wilson, and several others, 
  proceeded to Armbruster's house, and arrested him about three o'clock on 
  Saturday morning.  He denied having a hand in the murder of his wife, and said 
  the first he knew of this tragedy was when he returned home on Friday last.
  It is the general opinion of the neighborhood where the murder was 
  committed that Armbruster is the murderer.  The house of Armbruster is located 
  in a meadow or sort of swamp, isolated from other houses.  The land is made 
  alternately of a cleared plot, a swamp and thicket, and these obstructing the 
  view a short distance from the house.  At the time the murder was committed 
  his son and son's wife and child were out in the meadow at work, not far from 
  the house, but out of sight.  Mrs. Armbruster was also at work with her son, 
  but on noticing Kainich approach the house started towards him; and was found 
  some time afterwards with the fatal wound inflicted upon her body.  It is 
  supposed that Armbruster was lying in wait, watching an opportunity to carry 
  out his desperate intention, and when Kainich departed, he rushed to the house 
  and committed the terrible deed, and then fled.  Many circumstances 
  corroborate these suspicions.
  
=============

  Commonwealth vs. Jacob Armbruster - Indicted for Murder September 18, 1855

   The Bucks County Intelligencer September 18, 1855

  Jacob Armbruster was arrested and brought to prison about a month since, 
  charged with the murder of his wife, in Nockamixon township.  She was found 
  lying in the doorway of their house, weltering in blood, and lifeless, and her 
  grand-child, a mere infant, creeping about on the floor, besmeared with the 
  blood of its parent.  We published the details of the murder at the time, and 
  need not recapitulate them now.  Philip Koenig, who, it seems, was seen 
  leaving the house of Armbruster shortly before the discovery of the murder, 
  was arrested on a charge of having committed the crime, and lodged in prison, 
  but was subsequently discharged, so sufficient reason appearing for his 
  detention.  Armbruster had not been seen by the neighbors since the Wednesday 
  night previous, the murder being committed on Friday evening, the 3d of 
  August, but subsequent events and discoveries tended to fasten suspicion upon 
  him as the murderer.  He had lived disagreeably with his wife, and they often 
  quarreled, and sometimes had violent altercations, ending in personal assault 
  and injury.  He had been heard to make the most violent threats against the 
  life of his wife.  The title to the land which they occupied, was held by his 
  wife, and he feared that in the event of her death, it would be willed to some 
  person other than himself.  This he swore he would prevent, in the presence of 
  witnesses who testified to the fact on the trial.  The defendant had been in 
  the habit of being absent from home for days at a time on the canal upon which 
  he was employed as a boatman in the summer.  On the Friday succeeding the 
  murder, information reached Scott A. Erwin, Esq., that Armbruster had 
  returned, upon which he was arrested, and brought before the justice for 
  examination.  The evidence adduced on the examination was a very strong 
  nature, though entirely circumstantial, and he was committed for trial.  The 
  coat which he had on had stains of blood upon the sleeve, and had the 
  appearance of having been recently washed.  It was produced in Court, and 
  identified as being Armbruster's coat - he explained the circumstance of the 
  blood at the examination by saying he got it there fighting at the election, 
  when that was suggested by some one present.  The evidence of the boy, John 
  Black, who saw him running away from the house about the time the murder was 
  committed, and that of John Osborne, and Esq. Erwin, to whom Armbruster had 
  threatened violence to his wife, went strongly against the prisoner and was 
  met by no adequate rebuttal on the part of the defendant.  To Wilhelmina 
  Armbruster, his daughter-in-law, he had said that he would kill them both, and 
  settle the disposition of the property.
  The trial was commenced on Wednesday afternoon - Nathan C. James, 
  Esq., acting for the commonwealth, and George Michener for the defendant.  A 
  number of the jurymen called were excused on account of conscientious scruples 
  against capital punishment, and several challenged by the defendant.  The 
  jurymen called were as follows:
  Ezekiel Tomlinson - Excused.
  Elias Hartzel - Challenged by defendant.
  1.ISAAC FRETZ - Bedminster.
  2.MERRITT MAR[?]N - Wrightstown.
  Aaron Rose - Excused.
  Charles Willett - Challenged by defendant.
  Harman Yerkes -                            
  Martin Bewighouse - Set aside by Commonwealth.  Challenged.
  William Heston - Excused.
  Thomas Paxon, Jr. - Excused.
  Elias E. Paxon - Excused.
  10.TIMOTHY PICKERING, Doylestown township - Set aside by Commonwealth.  
  Challenged.
  George C. Campbell - Excused.
  3.RICHARD K. BISPHAM, Middletown.
  4.WILSON D. LARGE, Upper Makefield.
  5.THEODORE FLACK, Warwick.
  11.JOSEPH C. TAYLOR, Lower Makefield - Set aside by Commonwealth.
  Samuel G. Martindell - Set aside by Commonwealth.
  Reese Cadwallader - Excused.
  Stephen Taylor - Excused.
  Cornelius Shepherd - Challenged by Commonwealth.
  Jonas Killmer - Excused.
  6.LEWIS ROBERTS, Wrightstown.
  Lewis R. Holt - Excused.
  Lewis Bird - Challenged by Commonwealth.
  7.CHARLES MYERS, Plumstead.
  John Wildman - Excused.
  Comly Hampton - Excused.
  Joseph K. Taylor - Excused.
  8.RICHARD CORSON, Middletown.
  9.B.F. STREETER, Middletown.
  Jacob Hofford - Challenged by Commonwealth.
  John L. Moyer - Excused.
  Samuel Foltz - Unwell, and excused.
  Dr. Isaac Ott - Challenged.
  The regular panel of jurors was here exhausted, and one more juryman 
  being needed, the Sheriff proceeded to summon talesmen from the spectators in 
  the Court room.  But two were called, viz:
  Tobias Reiter - Challenged by Commonwealth.
  12. J. WATSON CASE, Buckingham.
  Timothy Pickering and Joseph C. Taylor, who had been set aside by the 
  Commonwealth, were recalled and qualified, and the trial was commenced.
  The defendant, upon being arraigned, plead not guilty.  The 
  Commonwealth opened the case, and proceeded to call witnesses.  We give the 
  substance of the testimony of the principal witnesses, as far as it could be 
  obtained.
  Wilhelmina Armbruster, affirmed - I never heard him threaten her life; 
  her arm was broken in Germany; he struck her once but made no threats; her arm 
  was not broken then; he struck her and made a hole in her head.  He went away 
  early on Wednesday of the week she got killed; they did not quarrel; he slept 
  that night and the night before in another room.  I was not asked to swear to 
  anything before the jury, except as to her death.
  Dr. Bartolet, sworn - I made the post mortem examination; was called 
  by Esq. Erwin to attend at the inquest; I did so, and found the body dead and 
  cold; I examined the body - the jugular vein was cut two thirds off, and the 
  carotid artery was completely severed; it was the size of a large goose 
  quill.  There was a small hole in the gullet.  The entrance was back of the 
  jaw, and the muscles of the neck looked as if it had been cut with a mason 
  trowel, but might have been made by a small instrument.  That wound was the 
  cause of her death.  She might have lived 15 or 20 minutes.  A pool of blood 
  was near the hearth.  On the gate were marks of bloody fingers; I will not 
  swear that this is blood on the coat.  I turned up the hem and found 
  coagulated blood as I thought; I tasted it, and think it was blood.  I believe 
  a knife of this kind would make such a wound.
  Cross-Examined - I could not distinguish the blood of an animal from 
  human blood by the taste; it was one or two weeks from the time of the murder 
  that I saw the coat; the marks are paler; I judge from the fact that the blood 
  was not worked into the lint of the coat that it had not been there long; it 
  appeared as if it had been washed.
  Thomas Gwinneri, sworn - Defendant called on Monday previous to the 
  murder; he wanted information about the property; I told him he had no right - 
  that she would sell it and keep the money or will it; if she died it would 
  come to him; he said, I will fix that, but say nothing.  They did not live 
  together very agreeable the latter part of the time; the wife said she was 
  afraid to go home.  The subject was the property - he wanted it back.
  Cross-Examined - When my wife said, he may kill his wife, I thought 
  so too.  This was Monday, the 31st of July; on Friday afterwards she was 
  killed.  She said she was afraid the old man would kill her; this was about a 
  year ago.  She was a high tempered woman, they were about alike in temper; he 
  is mild and peaceable when sober.
  Wilhelmina Armbruster, recalled - We found the body in front of the 
  house, near the well.  I called mother; I called a young man - he came, and I 
  went to the neighbors and called them.  That same morning we had four mowers 
  cutting grass.  We were all out making hay; the Dutchman and King went after 
  milk; King stayed here; it was just six o'clock when we found the body.  Did 
  not see the defendant from the time he left until after the murder.
  John Osborne, sworn - Had a conversation with defendant on the last of 
  July; he said his wife wanted him to get meat at night for the mowers.  He 
  said he would not take his money, she said he must pay; she said she would 
  poison him with arsenic in his coffee.  I saw him on Friday night or Saturday 
  morning; he said I would near of something, and see something; he said he was 
  going to law with the old woman about his going to poison her; said he was 
  going to get his land back; would see Gwinner.  They quarreled a great deal 
  when he was at home; she was a quarrelsome woman.
  Scott A. Erwin, sworn - A man came for me on the 3d of August; said 
  Christiana Armbruster was killed.  It was dark when I got there - several 
  neighbors were there.  On Saturday morning, a week after the murder, I issued 
  a warrant.  I picked up the coat and took the knife out of the pocket.  After 
  the hearing, I examined the coat and found blood marks, and said that looks 
  like blood, where did you get it?  He said he did not know.  A young man said 
  he might have got it at the election; Jacob then said yes, yes I did; when I 
  found the blood he showed a change in his countenance; he said the old woman 
  is dead, and all now is mine; he could not tell of any place where he had 
  been; said he had been in Doylestown; when he heard of the murder he came 
  home; his coat had been washed - there was dampness in the cloth then.
  John Black - sworn - I am ten years old; saw a man going across the 
  meadow from towards Armbruster's house; he was running; am not certain it was 
  Jacob; it was the same day as the murder, near sundown.  He was a short chunky 
  man.  Never saw him but three times before, about a year ago.  He had a brown 
  coat on when I saw him running; that looks like the coat, he had blue pants 
  and black hat.
  Cross-Examined - He was running pretty fast.  He was running through 
  John Purcel's meadow.  I told this first to mother when I got home; I was not 
  asked - no one said anything about what I should say here; he came into the 
  woods from the meadow; did not see his face, he had his head down.
  The commonwealth here closed, and witnesses were called for the 
  defense.
  John Armbruster, sworn - Father went away about the last of March, and 
  came back in August.  The coat was not then where I was at home; he took it 
  along when he went away; I was at the election last March; he was fighting in 
  the afternoon; he was bruised a good deal; he had some blood about him.  The 
  old people would quarrel, but it would not last long; never saw him strike 
  her.  She was not afraid of her life; never heard her say she was.  She was on 
  bad terms with some of her neighbors.  I and my mother always lived on good 
  terms.  Money was missing after this woman was found dead.  Jacob had his coat 
  on at the election; the money was left in care of my mother; it was $245.  
  There were seven acres in the lot where we lived; it was bought four or five 
  years ago.  They have been here 14 or 15 years.
  Cross-Examined - I never examined the coat, he had this coat on when I 
  saw him fight; his shirt sleeves were bloody; never said to my wife she must 
  swear this coat was in Lehighton; I said I did not believe he had killed her, 
  and do not believe it yet.  I might have been mistaken that it was in August 
  he came back; he as always satisfied about our land as far as I know.  We 
  agreed to keep him; he would sometimes go away; he is kind when he is sober, 
  and cross when in liquor; mother was not afraid for us to go away; he is about 
  46 or 47; we kept our clothes in the same room; I would have seen the coat if 
  it had been there; he wore black pants striped with blue.
  Scott A. Erwin - I saw them fighting at the election; there was come 
  blood about them; could not see how much blood for the mud; King was committed 
  by me on suspicion, next morning; he is still in prison; I don't think he 
  could have killed her.
  Wilhelmina Armbruster - Jacob went away the last of march; took his 
  two coats and all he had; he came back towards the last of July; did not see 
  if his coat was in the bundle; he came back to our house after the murder; he 
  hung his shirts on the fence to dry - they were a little damp; he struck her 
  with a cane when the hole was made two years ago; did not see him strike her 
  since; don't what they quarreled about; mother and I lived on good terms - she 
  was quarrelsome sometimes.
  Cross-Examined - Never told anyone that I was afraid; did not say so 
  before the Jury; did not state to Erwin that he said he would kill us or 
  anything like it.
  Scott A. Erwin - In Rebuttal - Wilhelmina said the old man did it an 
  nobody else; that when he went away he said he would kill them both, and 
  showed how he would do it; John was opposed to the old man.
  Mr. James, the District Attorney, addressed the Jury for an hour, and 
  was followed by George Michener, Esq., on behalf of the prisoner, making a 
  strong appeal for his acquittal.  After the arguments of council were 
  concluded, Judge Smyser charged the Jury at some length, defining the 
  different grades of murder, and explaining the character of the testimony.  
  About 5 o'clock on Thursday evening the Jury left the Court room in charge of 
  special constables.  In about an hour and half the Court again assembled to 
  hear the verdict, which had been agreed upon.  The prisoner was brought into 
  the dock, and a large crowd waited in suspense for its announcement.  The Jury 
  was conducted into the room, and the verdict delivered - Guilty of murder in 
  the first degree.
  At the request of the council for the defendant, the Jury was polled - 
  each man rising as his name was called, and answering - Guilty of murder in 
  the first degree.  The prisoner manifested some anxiety as to the nature of 
  the verdict; but when it was announced not a symptom of feeling or uneasiness 
  was to be seen in his countenance.  He was remanded to prison to await the 
  sentence of the Court.
  Armbruster's appearance is far from being prepossessing; he has a 
  degraded, brutish look, no doubt induced by his intemperate habits; to the 
  indulgence of which his dreadful crime may be attributed.  The quarrelsome 
  dispositions of himself and wife when under the influence of liquor leave no 
  doubt that their life was an unhappy one, and this is confirmed by the 
  testimony.  The son of Armbruster, who was in court during the trial, was a 
  well dressed and respectable looking man.  Very little interest was felt in 
  the trial inside of the Court House, and a careless observer would hardly have 
  supposed from the proceedings that the life a [f]ellow being was involved in 
  the result.
  Armbruster is a man of considerable family.  His sons have generally 
  followed boating during the summer, making their home with their parents in 
  the winter.  He is a German; he and his wife having emigrated from Germany 
  some years since.  He was no idle spectator at the election fight in 
  Nockamixon township in March last.  Since his conviction of the terrible crime 
  of murder Armbruster has exhibited no signs of contrition.  On Friday he spoke 
  angrily to his son, who visited him in prison, and expressed a regret that he 
  ever came to America.  The court will pronounce sentence of death upon the 
  unfortunate and hardened wretch some time during the present week.
 

=============

  Sentence of Armbruster September 25, 1855

  The Bucks County Intelligencer September 25, 1855

  On Wednesday afternoon last, at the assembling of the Court, Jacob Armbruster 
  was brought up to receive the sentence of the law for the murder of his wife, 
  Christiana Armbruster.  After he was placed in the dock, Judge SMYSER asked in 
  the usual form what he had to say; why sentence of death should not be 
  pronounced against him.  To this he responded in German, that he wanted a new 
  trial, and that he could prove that on the week of the murder he was in a 
  distant part of the country.  As he had made this statement previous to his 
  trial, and it being unsupported by any evidence, the Judge did not feel at 
  liberty to grant his request, and proceeded to pass the sentence of death upon 
  him in the manner reported elsewhere.  He received the solemn and earnest 
  warning of the judge with an unmoved countenance, which continued unchanged 
  and unaffected even when the terrible decree of death upon the gallows was 
  pronounced upon him.  We learn that in prison, since his sentence, his conduct 
  is much more mild and submissive than before - he is glad to see his old 
  acquaintances, and talks freely of his impeding fate, but has not yet 
  confessed his guilt.
  
  The following sentence of death pronounced upon Jacob Armbruster by Judge 
  SMYSER on Wednesday; sentence of Death Passed upon Jacob Armbruster.
  Jacob Armbruster - You have been convicted by a Jury of your country 
  of the willful murder of Christiana Armbruster, your wife; and you will soon, 
  very [soon] be called upon to expatiate that offense, by a shameful and [??] 
  death on the gallows.  If the doom that awaits you is dreadful, your crime has 
  been no less so.  At its hideous aspect nature shrinks, and humanity 
  shudders.  Your victim was your wife, the partner of your bosom, the mother of 
  your children!  She was often and long subject of your unkindness.  Once she 
  was obliged to appeal to this court to interpose the shield of the law for her 
  protection from your abuse; but the warning was given in vain.  Oh!  That you 
  had then heeded it!  Then, she would not now be the untimely tenant of the 
  tomb, nor you the doomed victim of the law you have so grievously offended.  
  True, she may not have been always blameless; but she was a woman, and you 
  wife.  In that two-fold character, she should have been safe from outrage at 
  your hands.  But you seem to have been incapable of feeling the force of a 
  sentiment like this.  Intemperance, with you, as with thousands of others, 
  seems to have been your bane, and to have aided in your ruin; for it is in 
  testimony, that when under its influence, the evil qualities of your nature 
  were most developed and displayed.
  With mind and heart thus prepared for the crowning and supreme act of 
  guilt, the temper, the arch enemy of souls, found you.  You looked with eyes 
  of covetous desire on her little property which she held in her own right.  
  You inquired, and were told that if she died intestate, it would be yours; and 
  so thinking, you resolved to secure it, and prevent any other disposition of 
  it by deed or devise, by taking her life with your own homicidal hand.  The 
  [??] design was darkly shadowed forth in your language to Thos. Gwinner and 
  John Osborne.  It was a slight temptation to so horrid a deed; but it 
  sufficed.  Withdrawing yourself from home under a simulated journey, you 
  lurked in the vicinity of your dwelling, awaiting the favorable opportunity, 
  like the tiger awaiting his spring.  It came.  You entered.  The knife was 
  aimed at the throat of your miserable victim!  The blow descended , and the 
  life-blood of Christiana Armbruster was poured forth like water on her own 
  hearth stone!  Leaving your victim to welter in her gore, you fled, as you 
  thought, unseen.  Vain hope!  The eye of Omniscience, that never sleeps, was 
  on you, and summoned guileless childhood to the spot, to witness and testify 
  to your hurried flight from the scene of blood.  The bloody coat you wore on 
  the occasion, still bearing the sanguinary stains of Murder, was produced, a 
  mute but terrible witness against you; and your vague allegation that you were 
  at a distant point on the afternoon and night of the murder, unsupported by 
  any attempt at proof, when if true, proof was so easy, only strengthened the 
  toils by which you were environed.
  Rash man!  Did you not know that the earth drinks the blood of the 
  murdered, cries out unceasingly against the murderer, until justice has done 
  her full and perfect work.  That work will soon be consummated.  Avenging 
  Justice has her hand upon you now, soon to strangle you in her grasp!
  Believe me, these remarks are not made to harrow up your feelings, or 
  wantonly to prove a fresh and bleeding wound.  But it will be wholesome and 
  salutary for you to realize in all its magnitude and overwhelming horror, the 
  deed you have committed.  I would have you do so, that you may be better 
  disposed and prepared to address yourself to the work of prayer and penitence, 
  as a preparation for your near and approaching doom.  The shadow of death is 
  upon you even now, and you are already signed and sealed for the grave.  You 
  will not realize, in all its dread reality, the startling fact!  I tell you, 
  death is now at your side with outstretched arms, ready and eager to fold you 
  in his embrace!  Will you not realize his presence?
  Look behind you, and what there do you behold?  Your wife, your 
  murdered, butchered wife, lying on the hearth, weltering in gore!  Anon she 
  rises and with eyes swimming in blood, with tottering, reeling gait, the death 
  damp on her brow, she staggers onward from the fatal room, across the yard, 
  until she reaches the gate, when she falls, and dies.  Look behind again.  You 
  see a bloody track from the room of murder to the gate of the yard, traced 
  with the life blood of the dying woman!  Look once more.  You see a child, a 
  babe, her grandchild - your grandchild - dabbling its little hands and feet in 
  that pool of blood.
  Now look before you, and see the gallows, the coffin and the shroud, 
  closing the short vista of life still in your view.
  Oh!  I adjure you, by all your hopes of Heaven and fears of Hell!  By 
  your own immortal soul whose eternal destiny is in the balance!  That you at 
  once address yourself in fervent and unceasing prayer to Almighty God that he 
  may enable you to see your crime in all its horror, may soften your heart to 
  penitence, and fit you for your awful change!  That is your only hope; and you 
  have no time to lose in availing yourself of it.  Cast from you every 
  expectation of earthly pardon or escape - for I solemnly assure you of my firm 
  conviction that you have no just ground of hope of either.  So far as this 
  world is concerned, your account with it will soon be closed.  Your doom is 
  certain and inevitable.  So regard it!  And so regarding it, let you undivided 
  attention be given to prepare yourself for death and judgment!  If the 
  crucified, dying Savior, promised salvation to the thief on the cross, you 
  need not despair of his salvation likewise, if you will but seek it in the 
  right way in that same Cross, is your only hope!  There is your only refuge!  
  To what [carthly?] hope you can cling.  You have had a fair and impartial 
  trial, before a jury almost of your own selection; and you have been defended 
  by able and faithful council, by whom nothing has been left undone that could 
  have availed you.  It has been unavailing; your doom is about to be spoken.  
  The curtain is about to fall forever between you and Time, and the veil of 
  Eternity to be lifted!  May you be prepared to encounter its dread realities; 
  to this end, study diligently the Scriptures of Truth, that you may profit by 
  the examples there recorded.  Bow your spirit, in deep abasement and self 
  humiliation, beneath the might hand of God!  Pour fourth you heart in fervent 
  and unceasing prayer for penitence and [??].  Fly to the Savior!  Fly quickly, 
  for the avenger of [??] is behind you!  Take refuge beneath the cross; cling 
  to it with a grasp that death shall not loosen!  For if you let go, you are 
  lost!  Look, with believing eyes, on him who died thereon that sinners even 
  such as you, might live!  Thus may you find from Heaven, that mercy which the 
  inexorable just of man denies.
  But this painful scene has been sufficiently prolonged.
  It now only remains for me to pronounce upon you, in the name of the 
  law, its last judgment.
  The judgment and sentence of the Court is, that you, Jacob Armbruster, 
  be taken from the Court House where you are, to the common gaol [jail] of 
  Bucks County whence you came, and from thence to the place of execution within 
  the walls or yard of said gaol [jail], at such time as the Governor of 
  Pennsylvania shall order and appoint, and that you then there be hanged by the 
  neck until you are dead; and may God have mercy on your soul!
  
  This file has been created by a form at http://www.genrecords.org/pafiles/
  
  File size: 30.6 Kb